On 16/04/14 16:35, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:39:34 +0200 > Christian Tismer <tismer at stackless.com> wrote: >> >> I think in cases like hg command line scripts there is no need >> to import site just for hg scripts. > > If you don't import site you won't be able to import Mercurial in most > cases. Oh is that so? I thought about hg as a set of command-line scripts with a defined interface that should IMO not be dependent from any site-specific settings. Instead, it should be configured at install time, and after that be completely independent from site settings. > Also, talking about "scripts" is a bit silly here - Mercurial is a > full-blown applications with many modules and tens of thousands of > lines of code. Thanks for regarding my comments as silly. In my sense it would be silly if that full-blown app would suffer from or relate to site at all, tho. Apps are meant to be self-contained. regards - Chris -- Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com> Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4