RetroSearch Browse

Thu Apr 10 04:09:51 CEST 2014 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133882.html

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote:

> I consider the security enhancement/feature question to be in the domain
> of PEP 466. If security stuff lands in the 2.7 branch, it will get
> released eventually is all I'm saying.
>

Thanks for the response.

>> Instead dealing 2.7 will just be completely optional for core developers

I was worried about this part, that if bug-fixes are
optionally back-ported, then we may end up a inconsistent, undesirable
state.
Instead it could be that bug-fixes fixes will be back-ported as long as it
is alive (and folks seem be excited about keep it alive for a long long
term).

-- 
Senthil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140409/47bdf83f/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-April/133882.html below:

[Python-Dev] death to 2.7; long live 2.7