On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote: > >>> print now() + RelativeDateTime(months=+1, day=1) > 2014-05-01 14:49:05.83 I find this sort date arithmetic unintuitive, though I'm at a loss to come up with better logic than you have: >>> d = Date(2014, 2, 28) >>> d + RelativeDateTime(months=+1) <mx.DateTime.DateTime object for '2014-03-28 00:00:00.00' at 1eda8c8> >>> d = Date(2014, 1, 31) >>> d + RelativeDateTime(months=+1) <mx.DateTime.DateTime object for '2014-03-03 00:00:00.00' at 1eda870> I guess the assumption is that one month is the length in days of the current month, though, you wind up with situations where shorter months can be skipped altogether. Is there a way to talk in terms of "months" but not have short months get skipped? Thx, Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4