A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-October/122255.html below:

[Python-Dev] return type of __complex__

[Python-Dev] return type of __complex__ [Python-Dev] return type of __complex__Mark Dickinson dickinsm at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 18:31:07 CEST 2012
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
> 2012/10/19 Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni at gmail.com>:
>> indeed, you are right. So I suppose that in pypy we could just relax the check
>> in cmath and be happy. Is there any chance that this will be changed in 2.7
>> and/or 3.x?
>
> Certainly 3.x, but not 2.7.

+1 for relaxing the check in 3.x.

The cmath code uses "PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "D", ...) for this;
perhaps it's the "D" format for PyArg_ParseTuple that should be
relaxed.  It seems more than reasonable to allow floats wherever a
complex number is expected.

Mark
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4