2012/10/4 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:46:57 +0200 > martin at v.loewis.de wrote: >> >> Zitat von Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>: >> >> > I only see one argument against such refactoring: it will be harder to >> > backport/forwardport bugfixes. >> >> I'm opposed for a different reason: I think it will be *harder* to maintain. >> The amount of code will not be reduced, but now you also need to guess what >> file some piece of functionality may be in. Instead of having my text editor >> (Emacs) search in one file, it will have to search across multiple files - >> but not across all open buffers, but only some of them (since I will have >> many other source files open as well). >> >> I really fail to see what problem people have with large source files. >> What is it that you want to do that can be done easier if it's multiple >> files? > > Navigate, basically. That is, switch between different pieces of code, > without having to type in some text to search for. I find it's only possible to navigate without searching for extremely small files. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4