Nick Coghlan writes: > I proposed to Larry originally that we start the alphas 6 months > after 3.3.0, I like this idea better, even though to keep the total workload constant you'd need to more than double the interval between alphas. Still, a 10- or 12-month release schedule feels like a much bigger commitment to me (and I have managed a release that took 6 months, so I do know what that feels like for real). > but he didn't like that idea, so I since reduced it to simply doing > alpha 1 early so that it din't mean any more work for the release > team. Heck, if you're only going to have *one* early alpha, you could do it yourself, and see if you can persuade the installer builders to volunteer one extra build.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4