On 1 March 2012 12:37, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > Actually I find fronzendict concept quite useful. We also have an > implementation in our framework, and we use it, for instance, in > http request object, for parsed arguments and parsed forms, which > values shouldn't be ever modified once parsed. The question isn't so much whether it's useful, as whether it's of sufficiently general use to warrant putting it into the core language (not even the stdlib, but the C core!). The fact that you have an implementation of your own, actually indicates that not having it in the core didn't cause you any real problems. Remember - the bar for core acceptance is higher than just "it is useful". I'm not even sure I see a strong enough case for frozendict being in the standard library yet, let alone in the core. Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4