Hello, > Could you try benchmarking with the "standard" benchmarks: > http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ > and see what sort of performance gains you get? > Yeah, of course. I already did. Refere to the page listed below for details. I did not look into the results yet, though. > How portable is the threaded interpreter? > Well, you can implement threaded code on any machine that support indirect branch instructions. Fortunately, GCC supports the "label-as-values" feature, which makes it available on any machine that supports GCC. My optimizations themselves are portable, and I tested them on a PowerPC for my thesis, too. (AFAIR, llvm supports this feature, too.) > Do you have a public repository for the code, so we can take a look? > I have created a patch (as Benjamin wanted) and put all of the resources (i.e., benchmark results and the patch itself) on my home page: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~sbruntha/pydev.html Regards, --stefan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4