RetroSearch Browse

Sun Feb 26 16:11:42 CET 2012 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116880.html

+1 for won't fix.
On Feb 26, 2012 9:46 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:27:21 +0100
> Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote:
> >
> > The underlying problems with memoryview were intricate and required
> > a long discussion (issue #10181) that led to a complete rewrite
> > of memoryobject.c.
> >
> >
> > We have several options with regard to 2.7 and 3.2:
> >
> >   1) Won't fix.
>
> Given the extent of the rewrite, this one has my preference.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/anacrolix%40gmail.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120226/93115d90/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116880.html below:

[Python-Dev] State of PEP-3118 (memoryview part)