On 2/1/2012 7:49 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Tim Delaney > <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote: >>> 3) Should it be an exception, or just inherit from object? >>> Is it worth worrying about somebody trying to raise it, or >>> raise from it? >> >> If it's not actually an exception, we get prevention of instantiation for >> free. My feeling is just make it a singleton object. > > Yeah, a new Ellipsis/None style singleton probably makes more sense > than an exception instance. But now we're adding a new singleton, unrelated to exceptions (other than its name) because we don't want to use an existing singleton (False). Maybe the name difference is good enough justification. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4