On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:14:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 à 18:12 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : > > >> Not sure what you are using it for. If you need to extend the buffer > > >> in case it is too small, there is absolutely no way this could work > > >> without copies in the general case because of how computers use > > >> address space. Even _PyBytes_Resize will copy the data. > > > > > > That's not a given. Depending on the memory allocator, a copy can be > > > avoided. That's why the "str += str" hack is much more efficient under > > > Linux than Windows, AFAIK. > > > > Even Linux will have to copy a block on realloc in certain cases, no? > > Probably so. How often is totally unknown to me :) > http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Changing-Block-Size.html It depends on whether there's enough free memory after the buffer you currently have allocated. I suppose that this becomes a question of what people consider "the general case" :-) -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20111005/9878625e/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4