A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-November/114611.html below:

[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?

[Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7? [Python-Dev] file.readinto performance regression in Python 3.2 vs. 2.7?Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Nov 24 19:29:33 CET 2011
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 20:15:25 +0200
Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Oops, readinto takes the same time as copying. This is a real shame,
> because readinto in conjunction with the buffer interface was supposed to
> avoid the redundant copy.
> 
> Is there a real performance regression here, is this a well-known issue, or
> am I just missing something obvious?

Can you try with latest 3.3 (from the default branch)?

Thanks

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4