On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org>wrote: > Speaking for myself, I rewrite my git history because it is *not* > useful to me as is. Almost all of my git commits have a informational > half-life measured in hours once they're off tip, because I commit > with *every* save (I have an after-save-hook to do this), which I do > "early and often". Effectively, I use git as an extension to XEmacs's > undo/redo mechanism. > I, too, commit using git with every save (which I do early and often). It's saved my butt more than once. Awhile ago I came across the following nice tool that puts these intermediate commits in a side branch (that can later be abandoned) so they never show up in the main history: https://github.com/bartman/git-wip I imagine something similar could be written for hg. -- Daniel Stutzbach -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110322/20bea233/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4