On 2011-03-22 16:56, skip at pobox.com wrote: > > Sjoerd> Are you sure the hg pull part worked? > > Pretty sure: > > 2.7% hg pull > Enter passphrase for key '/Users/skip/.ssh/id_rsa': > pulling from ssh://hg@hg.python.org/cpython > searching for changes > no changes found > 2.7% cd ../2.6 > 2.6% hg pull > pulling from /Users/skip/src/hgpython/2.7 > searching for changes > no changes found > 2.6% cd ../2.5 > 2.5% hg pull > pulling from /Users/skip/src/hgpython/2.6 > searching for changes > no changes found > > Sjoerd> So, try hg pull and the look at the heads again. > > Looks the same to me. > > Skip Perhaps looking at the glog output will shed some light. If you don't have it yet, enable the graphlog extension, after which you can use hg glog to look at your clone. Look in particular at the changeset which is marked with an @ sign instead of an o. That (or those if you're in the middle of a merge) is the "parent" of your working set. -- Sjoerd Mullender -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 371 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20110322/0182783a/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4