RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 21 22:58:57 CET 2011 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109734.html

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:47:19 +0100
"Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> > ISTM, there has been substantial mission creep from 
> > the workflow described in the PEP.  If the current workflow
> > had been described there, I don't think it would have been
> > readily accepted.
> 
> I don't think PEP 385 actually *was* accepted at all (PEP 374
> was, selecting Mercurial). I had meant to insist on a formal
> review of the PEP, but gave up on that due to the time pressure
> to complete the conversion before PyCon.

I don't think a formal review of the PEP would have brought any of the
points which have been made after (or even during) the conversion.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/109734.html below:

[Python-Dev] Hg: inter-branch workflow