On 3/15/2011 1:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:19:24 +0100 > ezio.melotti<python-checkins at python.org> wrote: >> Modules/_ctypes/libffi/src/powerpc/ffi_darwin.c >> Modules/_ctypes/libffi_osx/powerpc/ppc-ffi_darwin.c > > libffi is a third-party library and you should probably not introduce > gratuitous changes in these files. It will make tracking changes with > upstream more tedious. This answers my question elsewhere of why revert real fixes. Perhaps the fixes could be submitted upstream. Is that status and the restriction on changes indicated in the file? -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4