On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > The way to do this, IMHO, is just create a local clone and work on it. Then > you can keep checking partial changes in without ever worrying about > accidentally modifying the official repo. Especially if some of this work is > experimental and bound to eventually be thrown away, I think it's a more > flexible way to work than use MQ. > > One thing to keep in mind though is backup. I may be paranoid, but I just > can't do anything of importance on a local machine (especially a laptop) for > any prolonged period of time without occasional backups. Thankfully, a > Mercurial repo is about the best tool you have for backing things up - just > remote clone it to bitbucket, google code or some place of your own and > periodically push there. Since I have multiple machines to keep in sync, I'm actually thinking a server side sandbox clone is the way to go. That will solve my local issue as well (since the sandbox clone will be separate from the main clone). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4