RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 30 17:31:36 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104350.html

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:

> Of course, this is only true if the core developers *do* submit to the same
> rules.  Is anyone proposing that current core committers have all their work
> reviewed before it is accepted?
>

I think most would welcome (or at least tolerate ;) ) additional review of
their code.

The hard part is encouraging contributors to find the time and motivation to
thoroughly review code that they aren't personally interested in (and
perhaps not even familiar with).

-- 
Daniel Stutzbach, Ph.D.
President, Stutzbach Enterprises, LLC <http://stutzbachenterprises.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100930/bd622a56/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104350.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews