A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/104302.html below:

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews

[Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews [Python-Dev] We should be using a tool for code reviews"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Sep 29 23:35:02 CEST 2010
> While I would personally love to see Rietveld declared the official
> core Python code review tool, I realize that since I wrote as a Google
> engineer and it is running on Google infrastructure (App Engine), I
> can't be fully objective about the tool choice -- even though it is
> open source, has several non-Googler maintainers, and can be run
> outside App Engine as well.

I considered having roundup post all patches to Rietveld (trust me
that I can solve the "what branch and revision problem").

However, the stumbling block is access control - I don't know how
to get roundup to post to Rietveld, "anonymously", so to speak.

So perhaps we should just run our own Rietveld instance next to Roundup.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4