On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote: > I hadn't realized that PEP 333 was never actually in the 'Final' status > (de facto, it has been so for years, of course). Given that fact, and > PJEs assurances, I think amending the PEP and then immediately declaring > it final is reasonable. And who is going to give the PEP its stamp of approval? I'm sorry, but all this weasel-wording about how these changes aren't really changes and how this standard wasn't really a standard make me very uncomfortable. I'm happy approving Final status for the *original* PEP 333 and I'm happy to approve a new PEP which includes PJE's corrections. I'm not going to approve Final status for a history-rewrite of PEP 333. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4