Am 26.09.2010 03:45, schrieb P.J. Eby: > I'm actually a bit surprised people are bringing this up now, since when > I announced the plan to make these changes, I said that nothing would be > changed that would break anything I think people read this as "nothing would be changed, period." However, you did make substantial changes to the specification (or else the whole exercise would have been pointless, I suppose, and you couldn't have claimed that WSGI is now Python 3-friendly when it previously was not). So this is essentially a new version of the spec. As PEPs themselves are not versioned (unlike, say, ISO standards), Guido insists it ought to get a new PEP number. Then, people declaring compliance can identify what specification they actually comply to. Declaring compliance to PEP 333 as-of-last-week-but-not-as-of-today is now difficult. This particularly puzzles people some of the existing WSGI servers are now incompatible to the PEP, when they still were compatible last week. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4