On 9/25/2010 1:08 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:02:06 +0200 > Georg Brandl<g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > >> Am 25.09.2010 18:53, schrieb Terry Reedy: >>> On 9/25/2010 7:11 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: >>> >>>> I'll bother Ezio when he's back. It just feels strange to me that the bit >>>> of statistic I feel is most interesting -- whether there are less open bugs >>>> at the end of the week than at the start -- is not obvious from the report. >>> >>> As of just now, the default search for all open issues returns 2475. >>> That is down steadily over the last 8 or so weeks from a peak of about >>> 2750 in early June. About 30 people have closed at least one issue in >>> this period. >> >> That's really promising. (And that's also why I want to see a negative delta >> for the "open" count.) Thanks for these numbers! > > Without any precision on how and why these bugs were closed, these > numbers don't mean anything. We would need a breakdown of bug closings > according to the "resolution" field, at the minimum. Doing some hand-counting because I do not have proper (as in sql query) access to the database, closed issues so far for Activity: 2010-09 174 fixed 36 invalid 31 out of date 1 postponed 18 reject 18 won't fix 7 works for me --- 285 -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4