On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > > For the record, the code is pretty much done now: > http://bugs.python.org/issue9360 Generally looks pretty reasonable. As I noted on the issue, my one concern is that the current API seems to rely on the programmer remembering which methods return strings and which return bytes without any consistent mnemonic as to which is which. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4