On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > I don't see what we gain by holding up the 3.2 release. Some writing a > Web application will need third-party modules anyway, so downloading > wsgi3ref shouldn't be too painful. I agree with you. Further, is wsgiref actually heavily used by web developers and or web framework developers at all ? I would tend to think that web developers might be more interested in using some of the larger more popular web frameworks such as: TurboGears, Django, Pylons, Cherrypy, etc. i don't think a Python 3.2 release should be held up because of wsgiref. cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- "Problems are solved by method"
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4