On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > On 9/15/2010 2:47 PM, Jesse Noller wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Raymond Hettinger >> <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 15, 2010, at 7:50 AM, Jesse Noller wrote: >>>> >>>> +0.5 >>>> >>>> The one area I have concerns about is the state of WSGI and other >>>> web-oriented modules. These issues have been brought up by Armin and >>>> others, but given a lack of a clear path forward (bugs, peps, etc), I >>>> don't think it's fair to use it as a measurement of overall quality. >>> >>> Any chance you're going to have time to do work on multiprocessing? >>> There are a huge number of bugs reports open for that module. >>> >> >> Trying to get that time; and I've recently brought on Ask Solem to >> help me there, I concur that the current situation is sub optimal. > > Great that the "bus number" for multiprocessing has gone up by one! > > regards > Steve No one is happier about this then me.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4