On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Maybe I've missed your answer, but what would prevent the "inline" > solution from working? Only PEP 7 (since standard support for inline is a C99 feature) On the other hand, if gcc (including cygwin/mingw) and MSVC support it (even with non-standard spellings), then that objection probably doesn't matter. > (a macro with the result-as-a-pointer is quite ugly) Agreed. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4