On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:51:28 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:14:27 -0700 > Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I would like to simplify and clean-up the API for the unittest module > > by de-documenting assertSetEqual(), assertDictEqual(), > > assertListEqual, and assertTupleEqual(). > > +1 from me. I don't disagree with this simplification, but given that you all want to pare down the unittest API, I'd be interested in your opinions on issue 10164. Because the assertBytesEqual method takes an optional argument, it seems like it would need to be documented, even though it would in a lot of cases just be used through assertEqual. -- R. David Murray www.bitdance.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4