On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 14:09, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > I don't feel like producing a complete list of build steps; the entire > process takes about four hours. So is most of this scripted, or is there just a process in your head? > The steps that are difficult to automate are: > - code signing > - testing the resulting installer > - uploading Why are those steps difficult to automate? I'd think that uploading is just some ftp commands. Signing might be a thing because you don't want the keys distributed. Testing the resulting installer could probably be automated in part, and people could still download the nightlies to do more testing. > However, in a significant number of releases, some of the build steps > failed, so it requires some investigation to find the source of the > problem. Well, sure, but if we do continuous builds we find failures like that sooner. Cheers, Dirkjan
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4