RetroSearch Browse

Fri Oct 29 22:32:36 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/105061.html

It certainly doesn't have to.

Sent from my digital lollipop.

On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:54:19 -0400
> Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>> Another quick thought. What would people think about regular timed releases if python 2.7?
>> This is probably more a question for Benjamin but doing sonmight
>> provide better predictability and "customer service" to our users. I
>> might like to see monthly releases but even quarterly would probably
>> be useful. Doing timed releases might also incentivize folks to fix
>> more outstanding 2.7 bugs.
> 
> Why would it only apply to 2.7?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Antoine.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/barry%40python.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/105061.html below:

[Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x