A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104892.html below:

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/ [Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Tue Oct 26 20:11:09 CEST 2010
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Raymond Hettinger
<raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote:
..
> Packaging is not always wrong.  Maybe it was the right thing to do for
> unittest, maybe not.

This is an example that I personally find ill-justified.  Particularly
annoying is the fact that opening __init__.py gives you a list of
relative imports and sends you to the next file for everything else.
Having both main.py and __main__.py seems redundant.    What were the
benefits  that justified unittest.py split?
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4