On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:24 +0200 Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > > This is probably sophistry, but if an issue is invalid, it doesn't need > a patch :) Not only, but it generally gets closed too. > The first stage seems to be "unit test needed" anyway, which > sounds to me a bit like "needs to be checked for reproducibility/validity". I don't like this first stage, it makes it look like we mandate a proper unit test to proceed with actually writing patches, which is really not true. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4