RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 7 23:20:23 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104522.html

Le jeudi 07 octobre 2010 à 23:17 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit :
> > As I said, most patches are supposed to be produced against py3k HEAD,
> > so you could try just that as the primary heuristic.
> 
> I think this is impractical. There are tons of patches (the majority)
> which are in the tracker and *not* against py3k head. So this heuristics
> will only cover a small minority.

I don't understand what the problem is. As long as the patch *applies*
cleanly on py3k HEAD, it's ok. If it doesn't, the patch will have to be
re-generated anyway.

> > I think you may trying too hard to find smart ways of inferring the
> > correct svn rev and branch, while developing against latest py3k is,
> > most of the time, the required standard. Outdated patches are not
> > really helpful anyway
> 
> Hmm. So how many versions should I go back in py3k until giving up?

Zero.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104522.html below:

[Python-Dev] Rietveld integration into Roundup