A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-October/104479.html below:

[Python-Dev] question/comment about documentation of relative imports

[Python-Dev] question/comment about documentation of relative imports [Python-Dev] question/comment about documentation of relative importsTerry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue Oct 5 21:37:47 CEST 2010
On 10/5/2010 2:21 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Darren Dale<dsdale24 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> The issue is implementing a PEP with nice support for relative
>> imports, and then documenting that it should never be used.
>
> Isn't this mostly historical? Until the new relative-import syntax was
> implemented there were various problems with relative imports. The
> short-term solution was to recommend not using them. The long-term
> solution was to implement an unambiguous syntax. Now it is time to
> withdraw the anti-recommendation. Of course, without going overboard
> -- I still find them an acquired taste; but they have their place.

Darren, if you have not yet done so, open a tracker that quotes the 
above and gives your recommended changes at which locations.


-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4