On 10/5/2010 2:21 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Darren Dale<dsdale24 at gmail.com> wrote: >> The issue is implementing a PEP with nice support for relative >> imports, and then documenting that it should never be used. > > Isn't this mostly historical? Until the new relative-import syntax was > implemented there were various problems with relative imports. The > short-term solution was to recommend not using them. The long-term > solution was to implement an unambiguous syntax. Now it is time to > withdraw the anti-recommendation. Of course, without going overboard > -- I still find them an acquired taste; but they have their place. Darren, if you have not yet done so, open a tracker that quotes the above and gives your recommended changes at which locations. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4