> Excluding a builtin name from __all__ sounds like a perfectly sensible > idea, so even if it wasn't deliberate, I'd say it qualifies as > fortuitous :) But then, a tool that looks into __all__ to find for example what objects to document will miss open. I’d put open in __all__. Regards
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4