RetroSearch Browse

Wed Nov 10 00:33:35 CET 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105465.html

On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:

> 2010/11/8 James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net>:
>> On Nov 8, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
>>> So it can be done, but the question is "Why?"
>> 
>> To keep the batteries included?
> 
> But they'll only be included in > 2.7, which won't be used much, [...]

If there was going to be an official python.org sanctioned Python 2.8 release, I'm not at all sure that'd be the case. Since there isn't going to be one, then yes, that's probably true.

James

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105465.html below:

[Python-Dev] Continuing 2.x