A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/105187.html below:

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/

[Python-Dev] On breaking modules into packages Was: [issue10199] Move Demo/turtle under Lib/Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 23:52:11 CET 2010
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>> So basically it seems like we have learned a lesson: we prefer to have
>> our code structured in files that match the public API. I think that
>> is a legitimate design rule for the stdlib to follow from now on, but
>> in the case of unittest it's too late to change it back (and it's a
>> minor price to pay to learn this lesson and to have Michael
>> maintaining unittest like he has been, plus we could consider using
>> the new structure so that the public API matches the file structure
>> when the need arises).
> 
> Something to note in PEP 8, perhaps?

I'll propose some PEP 8 wording in the bug tracker
(essentially advice on when and how to use packaging),
and everyone can offer their assent, dissent, and
word-smithing.


Raymond 

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4