On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >> So basically it seems like we have learned a lesson: we prefer to have >> our code structured in files that match the public API. I think that >> is a legitimate design rule for the stdlib to follow from now on, but >> in the case of unittest it's too late to change it back (and it's a >> minor price to pay to learn this lesson and to have Michael >> maintaining unittest like he has been, plus we could consider using >> the new structure so that the public API matches the file structure >> when the need arises). > > Something to note in PEP 8, perhaps? I'll propose some PEP 8 wording in the bug tracker (essentially advice on when and how to use packaging), and everyone can offer their assent, dissent, and word-smithing. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4