On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:43:57 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote: > > In general, this reminds me of the ipaddr discussions. I read through > the thread from March real quick to see if there was reasoning there > why this package should be an exception from the "normal" standards > track (that is, ripen on PyPI, then moving it in the stdlib when it's > mature -- where "mature" is another word for dead, really). I disagree that a stdlib module is a dead module. It is perfectly possible to augment the API with new functionality without breaking compatibility. You can also deprecate old APIs if you want. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4