On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > Which I still have to review. (Mark, if you're there, could you make a > brief post here on the mathematical definition of the new hash you're > proposing, and why it is both efficient to compute and good (enough) > as a hash function?) Never mind, Mark. I found your explanation here: http://codereview.appspot.com/660042/diff/19001/11009?column_width=80 -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4