On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22:05AM -0400, R. David Murray wrote: > > Real world example with issue8151. It is an issue with a trivial patch > > in it. Everything what is needed is to dispatch it to stable `commit > > queue` and port to trunk. It is not 'easy' - it is 'trivial', but I > > have no means to mark it as 'easy' either, so even this trivial fix > > lies in tracker for three days waiting for review. > > Three days? That's nothing :) I think Anatoly has a point, though; there are issues where the people discussing the fix have come to a consensus, but none of them are committers, or the committers involved are too busy. There's a patch ready to apply, but no committer knows about it. > To avoid issues involving C coding, try restricting your search to > 'Library' issues. There is C code in some library modules, but less so > than in the core ;). It would be nice if you could search on more than Actually Library should pretty much always be pure-Python. Issues related to C modules such as socket are classified under the 'Extension modules' component. Of course, sometimes the ultimate cause will migrate (a bug in SocketServer.py is traced to a flaw in socket, for example). --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4