RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jun 26 04:59:31 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/101105.html

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
> 2010/6/25 Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com>:
> I would call it more a sign of no tests rather than one of neglect and
> perhaps also an indication of the usefulness of those tools.

Less than useful tools with no tests probably qualify as neglected...

An assessment of the contents of the Py3k tools directory is probably
in order, with at least a basic "will it run?" check added for those
we decide to keep..

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/101105.html below:

[Python-Dev] Signs of neglect?