On Jun 24, 2010, at 01:00 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>2010/6/24 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>:
>> On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>>>2010/6/24 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>:
>>>> Please let me know what you think. I'm happy to just commit this to the
>>>> py3k branch if there are no objections <wink>. I don't think a new PEP is
>>>> in order, but an update to PEP 3147 might make sense.
>>>
>>>How will this interact with PEP 384 if that is implemented?
>> I'm trying to come up with something that will work immediately while PEP 384
>> is being adopted.
>
>But how will modules specify that they support multiple ABIs then?
I didn't understand, so asked Benjamin for clarification in IRC.
<gutworth> barry: if python 3.3 will only load x.3.3.so, but x.3.2.so supports
the stable abi, will it load it? [14:25]
<barry> gutworth: thanks, now i get it :) [14:26]
<barry> gutworth: i think it should, but it wouldn't under my scheme. let me
think about it
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100624/18ba0bdb/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4