> Bill listed several other failures he saw on the buildbots and I see the > same set, plus test_posix. Still, the question would be whether any of these failures can manage to block a release. Are they regressions from 2.6? That would make them good candidates for release blockers. Except that I still would like to see commitment from somebody to fix them or else they can't block the release: if "we" don't mean that supporting a platform also means volunteering to fix bugs, then I guess "we" should stop declaring the platform supported. Just wishing that it was supported actually doesn't make it so. If the test failure *isn't* a regression, I think it shouldn't block the release. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4