RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 21 23:16:31 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100841.html

Am 21.06.2010 21:45, schrieb Michael Foord:
> On 21/06/2010 20:30, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2010/6/21 Bill Janssen<janssen at parc.com>:
>>> They are at the end of the buildbot list, so off-screen if you are using
>>> a normal browser. You have to scroll to see them.
>> But not on the "stable" view and that's the only one I look at.
>>
>
> What are the requirements for moving the OS X buildbots into the stable
> view? Are the builders themselves stable enough? (If the requirement is
> that the buildbots be green then it is something of a catch-22.)

It is indeed the latter (at least, how I understand it). The builder 
should "usually" give green, which means it should have done so over 
some extended period of time. If it then gets broken it means that 
somebody actually broke the code, rather than the system showing one of 
its glitches.

So asking for addition to the stable list *while* the slave is red is a 
bad idea.

FWIW, nobody has requested changing any of the build slaves to "stable" 
for the last two years or so.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100841.html below:

[Python-Dev] red buildbots on 2.7