RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jun 21 21:57:22 CEST 2010 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100819.html

Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

> Benjamin is not qualified to fix OS X bugs AFAIK (if you are, Benjamin,
> then sorry for misrepresenting you :-)). Actually, neither are most of
> us.

Right.  I was thinking that the release manager should however be
responsible for not releasing while there are red buildbots.  But it's
not his fault, either; there are no OS X buildbots on the "stable" list,
and that's the list PEP 101 says to look at.

The real problem here is that a major platform doesn't have a "stable"
buildbot, I think.  I've logged an issue to that effect.

> Apparently some of these buildbots belong to you. Why don't you step
> up and investigate?

The fact that I'm running some buildbots doesn't mean I have to fix the
problems that they reveal, I think.

I did look at the py3kwarn failure, and couldn't figure out the various
twisty passages of deprecation warning as further snarled by the test
package.  I think that one needs someone who's intimately familiar with
the testing framework.

Bill

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100819.html below:

[Python-Dev] red buildbots on 2.7