A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-June/100764.html below:

[Python-Dev] #Python3 ! ? (was Python Library Support in 3.x)

[Python-Dev] #Python3 ! ? (was Python Library Support in 3.x)Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Jun 21 14:33:08 CEST 2010
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <lvh at laurensvh.be> wrote:
> Okay cool, we fixed it: http://python-commandments.org/python3.html
>
> People are otherwise happy with the text?

Yep, looks pretty good to me.

I hope you don't mind, but I actually borrowed your text to seed a
corresponding page on the Python wiki:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3

It turns out the beginner's guide on the wiki doesn't even acknowledge
the possibility of downloading Python 3.1 rather than 2.6 to start
experimenting with Python.

The Wiki is probably a good place for this kind of material, anyway -
it makes it much easier for people to update as they identify major
third party libraries that do and don't have Py3k compatible versions
(and, some day, Python2 compatible versions).

Cheers,
Nick.

P.S. (We're going to have a tough decision to make somewhere along the
line where docs.python.org is concerned, too - when do we flick the
switch and make a 3.x version of the docs the default? We probably
won't need to seriously consider that question until the 3.3. time
frame though).

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4