A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/102442.html below:

[Python-Dev] Thoughts fresh after EuroPython

[Python-Dev] Thoughts fresh after EuroPython [Python-Dev] Thoughts fresh after EuroPythonGreg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue Jul 27 09:36:01 CEST 2010
Terry Reedy wrote:
> Should CPython be optimized for 1, 2, 3, or 4 or more cores?
> The answer to this is obviously changing. I will soon replace a single 
> core with a 4/6 core machine,

I don't think you can answer that just by considering the average
number of cores in a CPU. Even if my CPU has 4 cores, most of the
time the Python code I run on it isn't going to take advantage of
more than one of them, simply because it's not written to be
multi-threaded.

I would not like to be in a position where I *have* to use some
number of cores in order to get reasonable performance from my
Python code.

-- 
Greg
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4