On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:29 PM, geremy condra <debatem1 at gmail.com> wrote: ... > I've noticed that I don't have a lot of success in shifting this kind > of debate, so I'm not sure it's a good idea to publicly discuss > vulnerabilities in something that may wind up being implemented as-is, > but it's up to you guys. I think its best to have this discussed there publicly. In any case, mirrors are run by trusted people, so the risks are not very high AFAIK I think this discussion didn't have a lot of participant because most of us (that includes me) are not expert all all, if not ignorant, in this topic. A complete patch to the PEP, including a detailed description, is the best thing to do I think, to move this forward. Regards Tarek
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4