On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >>> >>> Given how high traffic python-checkins is I don't consider that a >>> reasonable place to send follow-up and nor do I consider it the >>> responsibility of committers to monitor it. As you said earlier this >>> *isn't* in our standard dev procedures and nor do I think it should be. >>> If you can't find an email address then either python-comitters or >>> python-dev would be a better place to send feedback. >> >> Maybe reply-to on the checkin messages could be set to python-dev. Not >> sure if that's a mailman feature, though. > > I think this would be a good idea. It would be nice to have on-topic traffic > here. :-) +1 FWIW. It is a good practice to make code reviews public. It teaches people the proper ways and encourages to participate in reviews. -- anatoly t.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4