On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > I'd like to get consensus as to whether folks feel that a PEP is needed. My > own thought is that I'd rather not do a PEP specific to this change, but I > would update PEP 384 with the implications on .so versioning. Please also > feel free to review the patch in that issue. I suspect you could write a new PEP faster than you could convince those suggesting the change needs a PEP (including me) that one isn't necessary. Presumably you were going to do a summary email for the mailing list anyway - just tidy up the formatting a bit and check it in as a PEP instead :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4