A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-July/101433.html below:

[Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readiness

[Python-Dev] Mercurial migration readinessÉric Araujo merwok at netwok.org
Sun Jul 4 14:41:36 CEST 2010
>>>> Not requiring any Mercurial extension to contribute to Python would be a
>>>> nice policy to lower the entry bar.
>>>
>>> That is already defeated by the need for the eol extension (which is now
>>> built-in in hg 1.6).  Activating mq is something every developer should
>>> manage...
>>
>> Okay, make that “not requiring any third-party Mercurial extension” :)
> 
> mq is anything but third-party.

Sorry, I didn’t want to imply that. What I meant was: Since eol is
already a requirement, and since extensions provide tremendously useful
things, it’s okay to require or recommend some of them.

MQ is in another category IMO not because it’s not shipped-with, since
it is, but because it makes you think differently that regular Mercurial
usage. (Not saying better or worse, just differently, thus a bit more
difficult for would-be contributors.)


> mq contains the strip command.

Which fits into regular Mercurial usage without requiring any MQ
knowledge, agreed.


By the way, is eol a requirement for people using Windows tools with
limitations only, or for every person that will clone Python?


Regards

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4